VED NARAYAN AND 6 OTHERS v. State of UP AND ANOTHER
A482/11067/2024 · 2025-09-15
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47560 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47560 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11067 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning.
2. Heard Sri Shivendra Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Deepak Kumar Verma, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri O. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1.
3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Case No.4107 of 2021 (State Vs. Shaukat Ali and others), arising out of Case Crime No.107 of 2021, under sections 147, 452, 323, 427, IPC, Police Station Ait, District Jalaun, as well as charge sheet dated 22.07.2021 and cognizance/summoning order dated 03.08.2021, passed by the Incharge Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun at Orai, on the basis of compromise.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed.
Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shivendra Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Deepak Kumar Srivastava, G.A. Ved Narayan And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by
learned counsel for the applicants.
6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants.
7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceedings of Case No.4107 of 2021 (State Vs. Shaukat Ali and others), arising out of Case Crime No.107 of 2021, under sections 147, 452, 323, 427, IPC, Police Station Ait, District Jalaun, as well as charge sheet dated 22.07.2021 and cognizance/summoning
order dated 03.08.2021, passed by the Incharge Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun at Orai, are hereby quashed.
8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. September 16, 2025 VKG A482 No. 11067 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad