/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE rPRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 4948 OF 2023 Between: Sagar Nagar RTD Layout Plot Owners and Association, Regd. No, 210 of 2022, #8-4-6/3, 4*^ Apartment, Doctors Colony, Peda Waltair, Visakhapatnam. Rep. by its Secretary. Residences Welfare floor, Tara Gev Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Principle Secretary (MAandUD), Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. 3. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam district. 4. The Zonal Commissioner, Zone-ll, Mathurawada, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. 5. The District Minorities Welfare Officer, District Collector's Office, Visakhapatnam. 6. The Visakhapatnam Metropolitan-Region Development Authority, 8th Floor, Udyog Bhavan, Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam. Rep. by Planning Officer. 7. Sagar Nagar Masjid-e-Ayesha Association, #4-160, HIG-ll-160, Sagar Nagar, Yendada, Visakhapatnam. Rep. by its President it's Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, praying that in the the High Court may be A pleased to issue a writ of MANDAMUS Or any other appropriate writ, order direction declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the several representations, lastly dated 12.12.2022 requesting to stop and demolish the construction being done by the 7*'' respondent in Plot No. 26 of the Visakhapatnam Regional Transport Department Employee's Co-operative House Building Society Limited, Sagar Nagar, Visakhapatnam, illegally without permissions and causing severe inconvenience to the residents, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of Constitution of India and violative of the Provisions of the Municipal Corporation Act in the interest of justice and consequently COMMAND the 2^^ respondent to demolish the unauthorized construction raised by the respondent in the subject property in the interest of Justice. or The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support there of and the earlier order of the High Court datedOl .03.2023, 19.02.2025 & 18.03.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J.V.PHANIDUTH Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP FOR MA & UD for Respondents 1 & 3, Sri K. Madhava Reddy, Standing Counsel for GVMC for Respondents 2 & 4, GP FOR REVENUE for Respondent 3, Sri V. Surya Kiran Kumar, Standing Counsel for VMRDA for Respondent 6, and of Sri P.Durga Prasad for the respondent No.7, the Court made the following. ORDER: At request, list the matters on 02.05.2025. Interim order granted earlier is extended till then Sd/ K. Srinivasa Raju ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. One CC to Sri J.V.Phaniduth, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri K. Madhava Reddy, Standing Counsel for GVMC 3. One CC to Sri V. Surya Kiran Kumar, [OPUC] 4. Two CCS to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of A.P. [OUT] 5. Two CCS to GP FOR MA & UD, High Court of A.P. [OUT] 6. One CC to Sri P.Durga Prasad, Advocate [OPUC 7. One spare copy [OPUC] Standing Counsel for VMRDA svp ' \ 4 HIGH COURT VN,J DATED:25.04.2025 List the matters on 02.05.2025 WP.No.4948 of 2023 INTERIM ORDR EXTENDED o 1- 2 WAY ?0?5 o .9: to r;<