Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47551 (CHH)

PARAS RAM YADAV v. SHRI DR. KAMALPREET SINGH

CONT/871/2024 · 2025-12-07

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:59430 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 871 of 2024 Paras Ram Yadav S/o Lt Nohar Ram Yadav Aged About 50 Years R/o Vill Temari, Ps Nandgaon, Dist Bemetara, Cg, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Shri Dr. Kamalpreet Singh The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Shri K.K. Pipri The Engineer In Chief, Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur, Dist- Raipur, ( C.G.). 3 - Shri B.S. Baghel The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department Raipur Circle Sirpur Bhawan Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.). 4 - Shri H. R. Dhruv The Superintending Engineer Public Works Department Division Durg, District Durg, (C.G.). 5 - Shri Niramal Kumar Thakur The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Division Bemetara, District- Bemetara, (C.G.). 6 - Shri Bhavesh Kumar Singh The Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub Division Bemetara, Distric, Bemetara, (C.G.). ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Advocate appears on behalf of Ms. Shivali Dubey, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1, 2 & 4 to 6 : Mr. Prashant Dansena, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 08.12.2025 1. Learned counsel for respondents No. 1, 2 & 4 to 6 would submit that in pursuance of order dated 16.10.2023 passed in WPS No. 1656 of 2013 by this Court, the applicant’s gratuity except leave encashment vide BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.12.09 10:43:00 +0530 2 order dated 24.11.2025 has been approved and so far as leave encashment is concerned, the same shall be released within 15 days from today itself. To substantiate his submission, he has submitted a copy of the order dated 24.11.2025. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for respondents No. 1, 2 & 4 to 6, nothing is required to be adjudicated in this petition by this Court at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. 4. A copy of order dated 24.11.2025 submitted by learned counsel for respondents No. 1, 2 & 4 to 6 is taken on record. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika