-fa\} IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: I-_a THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4401 OF 2025 Between : 1. M.S Yogesh, S/o M.Subramanyam, aged about 19 years R/o. D.No.10- ll, Ambedkar Street, Tadukupeta Dalithawada, Nagari MandaI, Chit{oor District (A-2). 2. G.Selvam, S/o Gurrapp`a,+ aged about 50 years, R/o. Main Street, Tadukupeta, Nagari Mandai, Chittoor District (A-4). . 3. K.PayanI-, S/o K. Kuppa Reddy, aged about 50 yearsJ R/o. D.No.ll-6, Pedda Street, Sundaramma KandrI-ga, Nagari Mandal, Chittoor Dis{rI'Ct (A6) Petitioners/Accusec! No.2, 4 and 6 AND 3t q'\S The S`tate, of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of f + , ```tI"Andhra pradesh, Amaravathi, Through Station House Officer, Nagari Urban `{.- •\ _tt. ..-*'6` "of,I P6I'ic'6.'StatiQn, Chittoor District. hh' ...Respondent petition under section 482 of BNSS (Old Section 438 of Cr.P.C.) praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased tO grant Anticipatory Bail to the Pet-ltioners/Accused No. 2, 4 and 6 in Crime No. 4 of 2025 on the file of the Nagari Urban Police Station, Chittoor District, in the event of their arrest. The petition coming on for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI KANDERI CHETHAN Advocate for the Petitioners, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent, and the Court made the following ORDER: !lN. THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4401/2025 Order: The Criminal Petition, u/Sec.482 of B.N.S.S is filed on behalf of the petitioners/A2, A4 and A6 to grant anticipatory bail in connection w-lth crime No.4/2025 of Nagari Urban Police Station, Chittoor District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioners/A2, A4 and A6 herein and others for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2),118(1),109(1), 351(2), 308(2), 326(g), 324(4) r/w 3(5) of BNS. 3. The brief facts of the case are that this is a case of wrongful restraint, causing hurt, attempt to murder, criminal intimidation, extortion, followed by mischief with commion intention that was occurred on 02.01.2025 at about 7.30 p.m., near Tadukupeta Sachivalayam, Tadukupeta Village, Nagari MandaI, Chittoor District and reported in the piolice station on 03.01.2025 at 2.00 a.m., by the defacto complainant M.K.Purushotham, wherein Al to A6 were wrongfully restrained him, forcibly took his bike keys, assaulted him with knives, soda bottle, beer bottle with intent to kill him and also beat him with hands and caused bleeding injuries to his head, dumb injuries to lit" his left wrist and I-nternal injuries to his back, damaged the Shop, set fire to bI-keS and threatened with dire consequences due tO previous grudges. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no specific accusations have been made against the petitioners/A2, A4, and A6. It is further submitted that A1, A3, and A5 have already been arrested and released on bail by the learned lv Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirupati, who observed that most of the investigation has been completed. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor also informs the court that the investigation l's almost complete, except for the arrest of some of the accused persons. 5. As seen from the record, no specific allegations have been made against the petitioners/A2, A4, and A6. Upon inquiry, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor states that the injured Person Sustained a COntuSiOn On the hand and an injury on the back. Based on the nature of the injuries, it is somewhat difficult to conclude that there was a deliberate attempt to cause grievous harm on the part of the petitioners. The accused Persons did not inflict any injurI-eS On the VI|tal parts of the body, Since most of the investigation has been completed, the charge sheet is yet to be filed, and the injuries alleged to have been sustained by the defacto complainant are simple in nature and not life-threatening] and given that the petitioners have a permanent residence at Nagiri MandaI, Chittoor District, there appears to be no likelihood of them absconding or fleeing from the jurisdiction of the Court ==P ~`S 6. 1n the said facts of the case, th[-s court js [ncljned to grant antjcipatory bail to petjtjoners/A2, A4 and A6, on the follow''ng COndi{I'OnS.- The petjtjoners/A2, A4 and A6 are directed to surrender before the station House officer concerned wjthjn two (2) weeks from today and on such surrender, the petitioners/A2, A4 and A6 sha" be released on bail on their executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each with one surety for a like sum each to the satl-sfaction of the arrestl'ng police officials. After release, the petitioners/A2, A4 and A6 sha" cooperate for investigatI'On and shall appear before the I'nVeStjgating officer as and when thel-r presence [®s requl-red. The petitl'oners/A2, A4 and A6 shall not cause any threat, I-ndl;cement or promI-Se tO the prosecution witnesses. 7. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed. //TRUE COPY/ 4 sss:Ssco7:i/:G:#c4:#ROAUR For A-_ To, 1. The station House officer, Nagari urban poll'ce Station, Chittoor Distr[-ct. 2. One cc to sRl. KANDERI CHETHAN, Advocate [opuc] 3. Two cos to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. One spare copy KN / HIGH COURT TIVI R,J + I+ I DATED : 02/05/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.4401 of 2025 ALLOWED i+' `-.'-``