[2025:RJ-JP:19780] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 510/2025 Ranveer Singh Son Of Madan Lal, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Panalava, Tehsil Laxmangarh,police Station Balara, District Sikar (Raj). At Present Residing At House No. 103-B, Kateva Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Jalesingh Son Of Harchand, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Vidhyak Nagar Chirawa, Jhunjkhunu (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avtar Singh for Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition is filed seeking quashing of FIR No.70/2023 registered on 08.02.2023 at Police Station Jhunjhunu for the offence under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. It is further submitted that dispute herein pertains to commercial transaction. Further, it is submitted that there is no ingredient of Section 420 IPC. Per contra, learned counsel for the State has furnished the factual report and has submitted that the same reflects that forged/scam is committed by the company in a well planned manner, whereby, economically disadvantaged or vulnerable [2025:RJ-JP:19780] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-510/2025] individuals were allegedly duped into investing in real estate transaction/schemes, promising assured returns. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon perusal of factual report, this Court has noted that evidence collected during investigation proves the commission of an offence under the provisions of Section 4, 5 and 6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 and relevant provisions of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 in addition to offence alleged under IPC; that scope of fraud seems to be extensive, with many members of public potentially affected, thus, the same cannot be given a colour of commercial dispute or private dispute. For the reasons stated above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. Factual report is taken on record. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/8