1 APHC010854612016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 585 OF 2016 Between: 1. Smt. Lanka mamatha, W/o. Lakshmana Rao, Hindu, aged about 31 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Door.No. 2-68, Kurellagudem, Amberpeta, Bhimadole Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Byreddi Satyanarana, S/o. Appa Rao, Hindu, Aged 52 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. D.No. 2-113, Ramalayam Street, Amberpeta, Bhimadole Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Respondent Appeal Under Section 47 of Guardian & Wards Act, against orders to set aside the Decree and Order dated 07-04-2016 in G.W.O.P.No.162 of 2015 passed by the Principal District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru and consequently allow the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CMAMP 1191 OF 2016 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for hearing the C.M.A., and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: S JAGADESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI And THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM C.M.A.No.585 of 2016 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam) The petition filed by mother, seeking appointment as guardian of minor child as well as other reliefs under Sections 7, 8 to 10 and 29 of the Guardian and Wards Act was dismissed by the learned Principal District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred by the appellant/petitioner. 2. Sri R.Satish Babu, learned counsel represented on behalf of Sri S.Jagadeeswara Rao, learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner submits that in view of afflux of time, the cause in the appeal becomes infructuous. 3. Since the cause in the appeal becomes infructuous, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARARAO KUNCHEAM, J Dt:23.12.2025 Rns 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM C.M.A.No.585 of 2016 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam) Dt:23.12.2025 Rns