Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47548 (KAR)

M/S PCM CONSTRUCTION AND GRANITE COMPANY v. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

WP/107826/2024 · 2025-03-24

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5338 WP No. 107826 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 107826 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S PCM CONSTRUCTION AND GRANITE COMPANY, NO.172, 6TH MAIN A BLOCK, VIJAYA NAGAR, 3RD STAGE, MYSORE-570 017, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SHRI. R.CHANDRAMOHAN S/O RANGASWAMY, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: NO.172, 6TH MAIN A BLOCK, VIJAYANAGAR, 3RD STAGE, MYSORE-570 017, TQ: DIST: MYSORE. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. ROSHAN SAHEB CHABBI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA NIRAVARI NIGAM NIYAMITA, COFFEE BOARD BUILDING, OPP. VISHWESHWARAIH TOWER, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA NIRAVARI NIGAM LTD., KNNL DIVISION, HBC DIVISION, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5338 WP No. 107826 of 2024 ATHANI-59, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA FOR R1; SRI. LINGESH.V.KATTEMANE., ADVOCATE FOR R2-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Roshan Saheb Chabbi., counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Praveen K.Uppar., AGA for respondent No.1 and Sri.Lingesh V.Kattemane., counsel for respondents 2 and 3 have appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn as the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the petition. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5338 WP No. 107826 of 2024 withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19