Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47537 (RAJ)

GIRRAJ S/O SH. DHARMPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/414/2025 · 2025-12-01

Bhuwan Goyal, Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48648-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 414/2025 Girraj S/o Sh. Dharmpal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Kakra, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. That Additional Director General Of Police Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur 3. Superintendent Of Police, Khairthal-Tijara District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Kishangarhbas District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) 5. Dharmveer S/o Sh. Bhajan Lal, R/o Village Jairoli, Police Station Jairoli, District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) 6. Sunil S/o Sh. Bhajan Lal, R/o Village Jairoli, Police Station Jairoli, District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) 7. Rajpal S/o Sh. Bhajan Lal, R/o Village Jairoli, Police Station Jairoli, District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) 8. Mahipal S/o Sh. Puran, R/o Village Jairoli, Police Station Jairoli, District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Karwasra, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal, Advocate Mr. Banwari Lal (CI), SHO, Police Station, Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal Tijara is present in person HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 01/12/2025 1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner (father) seeking custody of his daughter detenue baby “R”. [2025:RJ-JP:48648-DB] (2 of 3) [HC-414/2025] 2. Pursuant to the order dated 27.11.2025 passed by this Court, today the concerned police official has produced the detenue baby “R”, her parents and other relatives before this Court. He has also submitted the report dated 25.11.2025, which is taken on record. As per the said report, the detenue baby “R” is about 14 years of age, which has not been disputed either by counsel for the petitioner or by learned GA cum Additional Advocate General. Thus, the detenue baby “R” is a minor. 3. We have interacted with the detenue baby “R”, aged about 14 years, who firmly states before this Court that she does not want to go with her father (petitioner) and wishes to reside at One Stop Centre, Alwar. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that the detenue baby “R” is a minor girl aged about 14 years, we deem it proper to direct the concerned police official, who is present today in the Court, to admit the detenue baby “R” in One Stop Centre, Alwar, where she will remain till she attains the age of majority. The State authorities are also directed to ensure well being as well as regular study of the detenue baby “R” till she attains the age of majority. 5. During the intervening period, the parents of the detenue baby “R” will be at liberty to meet the detenue baby “R” in One Stop Centre, Alwar, as per applicable rules and regulations. It is also made clear that in future, if the detenue baby “R” wishes to go and reside with her parents and moves an appropriate application in this regard before the competent [2025:RJ-JP:48648-DB] (3 of 3) [HC-414/2025] forum, she may be sent with them after necessary verification. 6. Superintendent /In-charge/Caretaker, One Stop Centre Alwar is directed not to permit anyone else to meet the detenue baby “R” other than her parents. 7. The habeas corpus petition stands disposed of accordingly. 8. A copy of this order be provided to the learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General and a copy be also sent to the Superintendent /In-charge/ Caretaker of One Stop Centre, Alwar for necessary compliance (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DK/10