UDAYNARAYAN AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/11430/2024 · 2025-09-08
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47535 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47535 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11430 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. The matter is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Ms. Priti Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Munna Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State. 3. Instant application has been preferred for quashing of the charge sheet dated 17.8.2021 as well as summoning order dated 12.7.2022 in Case No. 3292 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 211 of 2021, under sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 452, 427, 308 IPC, P.S. Patherwa, District Kushi Nagar is pending in the court of Additional Session Judge Court No. 7, Kushi Nagar, Situated at Padrauna. It is also prayed to stay the further proceeding of aforesaid case during pendency of the present application. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that both the parties have amicably settled all the disputes and they have agreed for withdrawal of all cases, including present case, pending between the parties and the same has been verified by the court concerned. A report regarding the same is available on record. It is also submitted that in cross case, parties have also entered into compromise. It is further submitted that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Priti Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Munna Tiwari Udaynarayan And 8 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has no objection. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. Both the parties have amicably settled all the disputes and they have agreed for withdrawal of all cases, including present case, pending between the parties and the same has been verified by the court concerned. A report regarding the same is available on record. Considering the law laid down in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs.
Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the entire criminal proceeding of charge sheet dated 17.8.2021 as well as summoning order dated 12.7.2022 in Case No. 3292 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 211 of 2021, under sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 452, 427, 308 IPC, P.S. Patherwa, District Kushi Nagar is pending in the court of Additional Session Judge Court No. 7, Kushi Nagar, Situated at Padrauna, against applicants, are hereby quashed. 9. The application is allowed. September 9, 2025 SY A482 No. 11430 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad