SURENDRA NATH MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/5761/2016 · 2025-07-09
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47531 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47531 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110438 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5761 of 2016 Petitioner :- Surendra Nath Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Ojha,S.K. Shukla,Santosh Kumar,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Brijendra Kumar Srivastava,C.S.C.,Mohit Singh,Narendra Kumar Giri,O.P. Singh,Satyam Singh,Shiv Nath Singh,Shriraman Pandey,Sushil Kumar Rao Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Delay Condonation Application No. 20/2021 and Substitution Application No. 21/2021
1. Court cannot proceed to decide present writ petition on merit since none appears to press present substitution application.
2. Sri Shriraman Pandey, Advocate appears on behalf of proposed petitioner through impleadment i.e. son of original petitioner who died during pendency of this writ petition only for purpose of becoming pairokar.
3. Aforesaid prayer cannot be allowed when none appears to press substitution application filed on behalf of wife of deceased-petitioner.
4. Since no one has appeared to press this substitution application, therefore, present substitution application is rejected. No order is required to pass on impleadment application.
Order on Writ
1. Since learned counsel is not present either to press substitution application or argue on merit, therefore, writ petition is also dismissed.
2. This order is passed in presence of Sri Narendra Kumar Giri, learned counsel for respondents.
Order Date :- 10.7.2025 N. Sinha Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad