GAUTAM S/O VITTHAL BANSOD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VJNT, OBC AND SBC DEPT. MUMBAI AND ANOTHER
CAO/278/2025 · 2025-04-02
Shri Abhay J Mantri, Shri Avinash G Gharote
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47528 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47528 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2 cao 278.25.odt..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION (C.A.O.) NO. 278 OF 2025 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 5610 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.
2781
OF 2018 (D)
Gautam s/o Vitthal Bansod .Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions, Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. P.S. Borkar, Advocate h/f Mr. R.D. Wakode, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.V. Narale, AGP for Respondent No. 1/State.
CORAM :
AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : 2nd APRIL, 2025 Heard.
2. These applications have been filed for condonation of the delay caused in filing the application for restoration of the writ petition and to restore the writ petition, which was dismissed for failure to remove the office objections within the stipulated time.
3. Considering the reasons stated in the applications and no objection of the learned AGP, both applications are allowed as prayed.
4. The delay caused in filing the application for restoration of the writ petition is condoned, and the writ petition is restored to its original number and position.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) manisha 2025:BHC-NAG:3389-DB