[2025:RJ-JP:48839] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14542/2025 Sharif Son Of Aatiya, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Ghoghor, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused- Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.200/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that allegations against the present petitioner are for committing the online fraud. He again submitted that co-accused Jursaid was enlarged on regular by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 15.09.2025 and co-accused Asgar and Hoshiar vide order dated 06.02.2025 and co-accused Manish, Waseem vide order dated [2025:RJ-JP:48839] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14542/2025] 03.12.2024. He further urged that co-accused Kamil, Momin, Sharif, Shahrukh and Ajru vide order dated dated 17.01.2025 and Aadil S/o Rafiq vide order dated 20.12.2024 have been enlarged on anticipatory bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Therefore, he prays that on the ground of parity present petitioner be also granted benefit of bail. He further argues that the trial of the case will take considerable time. Therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sharif Son Of Aatiya, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/121