Makineni Ramesh Babu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/30334/2023 · 2025-09-22
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47522 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47522 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010587262023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30334/2023 Between:
1. MAKINENI RAMESH BABU, ,S/O. LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS,OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.24A-3-36, AMEENAPETA, KAPULA VEEDHI, ASHOK NAGAR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. (FORMERLY WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT).
2. MAKINENI SURESH BABU, S/O. LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 38 YEARS,OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.24A-3-36, AMEENAPETA, KAPULA VEEDHI, ASHOK NAGAR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. (FORMERLY WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT).
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE ELURU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, . REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, D.NO.22C-L 1-28, CHUNDURIVARI CHOULTRY STREET, MAIN BAZAR, AGRAHARAM, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT.
(FORMERLY WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT).
3. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, D.N0.22C-11-28, CHUNDURIVARI CHOULTRY STREET, MAIN BAZAR, AGRAHARAM, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. (FORMERLY WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT).
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
The petitioners have filed the present Writ Petition, aggrieved by the proposal to construct the ‘Jagananna Fish Mart’ on the eastern side road margin of the petitioners’ house.
2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and there is no such proposal.
3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 23.09.2025 SR