IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88037 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2025 Thana- GANGTA District- Munger ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad Singh S/o- Sitaram Singh R/v- Pankri PS- Gangta District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deep Anshuman, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 4 24-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gangta P.S. Case no.86 of 2025 registered under sections 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-B) (a), 26(1), 26(2) and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, on having received information about manufacture of illegal arms taking place, the informant states that a raid was conducted. While two persons including the petitioner herein were caught, three accused persons managed to escape. Various articles used in the manufacture of firearm were recovered from the place of occurrence. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The alleged Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88037 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 occurrence is said to have taken place by the river side and the petitioner had gone there to ease himself. The petitioner has no concern with the seized articles nor with the co-accused. No independent witness has supported the prosecution case. The petitioner is in custody since 31.7.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the petitioner having been arrested at the spot and various articles used in the manufacture of firearm having been recovered from the place of occurrence, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. Saurabh/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T