1 2025:CGHC:55545 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5955 of 2025 • Smt. Sandhya Rani Denjare, W/o Shri V.S. Singh, Aged About 41 Years, Presently Posted As Lecturer At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Amatola, Block Ambagarh Chowki, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki (Chhattisgarh). ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralay, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. District Education Officer, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.). 3. Joint Director Education Division, Opposite District Panchayat, G E Road, District Durg (C.G.). 4. District Magistrate, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.). 5. Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Amatola, District Mohla- Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.). 6. Smt. Prachi Mishra, W/o Shri Maruti Mishra, R/o H. No. 49, Laxmi Nagar, Saidarshannagar, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Posted As Lecturer At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Amatola. 7. Smt. Preeti Verma, W/o Shri Chavilal Verma, R/o Kusum Nagar, Ward No. 07, Stationpara, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Posted As Lecturer At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Amatola. 8. Smt. Rakhi Sahu, W/o Shri Vikram Singh Sahu, R/o Padurang Colony, Ward No.8, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Posted As Lecturer At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Amatola. 9. Shri Bhardwaj Verma, S/o Shri Anand Ram Verma, R/o House No. 140, Bajrangpara, Santana Nagar, Kohka Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.). ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. P.K. Goswami, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Deputy G.A. DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 14/11/2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has wrongly been filed as WPC, whereas in view of the pleadings made and the relief sought, it ought to have been as WPS, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file the writ petition as WPS. 3. State counsel has no objection with regard to the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. In view of above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge