ANPURNA WOMEN SELF HELP GROUP - BELGAHANA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/94/2023 · 2025-11-02
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47502 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47502 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 94 of 2023 1 - Anpurna Women Self Help Group - Belgahana Through President Smt. Amrika Bai W/o Ramkumar Sahu Aged About 45 Years, President Of Anpurna Women Self Help Group- Belgahana R/o Belgahana P.S. And Tahsil Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supply Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector (Food Department) Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Sub Divisional O0cer (Revenue) Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Food Inspector Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Govt. Faire Price Shop Marhikapa, P.S. And Tahsil Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) I.D. No. 402004122.
... Respondents For Petitioner : Shri A.N. Pandey, Advocate For State : Shri Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.11.03 14:22:05 +0530
2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Order on Board 03/11/2025
1. Challenge in this petition is to order dated 19.12.2022 (Annexure P1) issued by Sub Divisional O0cer (Revenue).
2. In view of fact that petitioner is having e0cacious remedy of an appeal under Clause 18 of Chhattisgarh Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 (in short ‘Control Order, 2016’), I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition on merits. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Petitioner is at liberty to challenge
order dated 19.12.2022 (Annexure P1) by way of an appeal under Clause 18 of Control Order, 2016. As subject matter of this writ petition is order dated 19.12.2022 and this petition is =led on 30.12.2022, in event petitioner prefers an appeal within a further period of three weeks from today, delay in preferring an appeal will not come in way for considering appeal to be =led by petitioner, on merits. If such an appeal is =led within aforesaid period, appellate authority shall consider and decide same expeditiously in accordance with law. Certi=ed copy today. Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
JUDGE Gopal