Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4749 (CHH)

SMT. TEMIN BAI SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/652/2025 · 2025-01-23

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:4158 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 652 of 2025 1 - Smt. Temin Bai Sahu W/o Kirtan Lal Sahu Aged About 36 Years R/o Near Ajay Kirana Shop, Shitala Para, Hathkhoj, Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg, C.G. (P.S. Wrongly Mentioned As Old Bhilai In The Covering Page Of Cause Title Of Impugned Order Sheet) 2 - Vijay Laxmi W/o Pramod Gavel Aged About 33 Years R/o Near Shiv Mandir, Shitalapara, Hathkhoj, Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg, C.G. (Husband Name Wrongly Not Mentioned In Cause Title Of Covering Page Of Impugned Order Sheet) 3 - Neera Singh Rajput W/o Ramnarayan Rajput Aged About 34 Years R/o Near Shiv Mandir, Shitalapara, Hathkhoj, Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg, C.G. (Husband Name Wrongly Not Mentioned In Cause Title Of Covering Page Of Impugned Order Sheet) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg, C.G. (P.S. Wrongly Mentioned As Old Bhilai In The Covering Page Of Impugned Order Sheet) ... Respondent(s) For Applicants : Ms. Aditi Singhvi, Advocate For Respondent : Ms. Pragya Shrivastava, Deputy Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 23/01/2025 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. , 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.403/2024 registered at Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, for 2 the offence punishable under Section 103(1), 190,191(1), 191(2), 191(3), 238 of BNSS, 2023 2. Learned counsel for the applicants prays for permission of this Court to withdraw the present bail application. 3. Learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the respondent/State, has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Subject to the Applicants furnishing a photocopy of the impugned order, the certified copy shall be returned to the applicant. sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge alfiza