JAGADISHWAR STONE CRUSHERS, PERECHERLA , GUNTUR. v. THE ASST. DIRECTOR, ESI CORPO,HYD AND ANOTHER
CMA/696/2012 · 2025-02-13
Nyapathy Vijay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47486 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47486 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 696 OF 2012 Appeal under Section 82 of ESI Act. against the order passed in ESI.No.27 of 1999 on the file of the Judge, Employees Insurance Presiding Officer, Labour Courf, Guntur dated 17-10-2005. Between: Court cum Jagadishwar Stone Crushers, Donka, Perecherla Managing Partner, T.Subba Reddy Guntur., Rep. by its ...Appellant/Petitioner AND
1. The Assistant Director, ESI Corporation, Regional Office
2. The Manager, ESI Corporation, Local Office, Kothapeta, Hyderabad Guntur. ...Respondents/Respondents Counsel for the Appellant; Sri C Niranjan Rao (No Representation ) Counsel for the Respondents: Sri V .C.H Naidu The Court made the following:
,/a APHC010723952012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 696/2012 Between: Jagadishwar Stone Crushers, Perecherla , Guntur. AND The Asst Director, ESI Corporation, Hyderabad & Others Counsel for the Appellant:
1.C N IRAN JAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.PASHAM SRINIVASULU 2.PUSHPINDER KAUR The Court made the following: ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT{S)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL N0.696 of 2012
JUDGMENT: The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Order dated 18.10.2005 in E.S.I.No.27 of 1999 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur, Guntur District.
1. There was no representation on behalf of the Appellant. It appears that the Appellant is not interested to prosecute the case. Therefore, the C.M.A is dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. There shall be no
order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- S.V.S.R. MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur, Gunur District.
2. One CC to Sri C Niranjan Rao Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri V.C.H Naidu Advocate [OPUC]
4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi.
5. Three CD Copies SAM
HIGH COURT % DATED;14/02/2025
JUDGMENT CMA.No.696 of 2012 dismissing the C.M.A FOR I^ON-PROSECUTION