HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 34282 of 2022 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for State. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of entire proceedings, including charge-sheet dated 30.12.2004 as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 26.05.2005, of Case No.10485 of 2010 (State Vs. Trivendra Kumar), arising out of Case Crime No.419 of 2004, under Sections 324, 504 IPC, P.S.- Shikohabad, District- Firozabad, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Firozabad, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicants that incident relates to private dispute between the parties and both the parties have compromised the case. In pursuance to order of this Court, the compromise filed by the parties before the court concerned, has already been verified by the court concerned, the copy of order of the same is available on record. The proceedings of the cross case lodged from the side of applicants have already been quashed by this Court on the basis of compromise between the parties. Referring to these facts, it was submitted that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for applicants and submitted that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the informant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajpal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pradeep Kumar Yadav Trivendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) does not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and thus the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties, by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 482 Cr.P.C. In the instant case, the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. The informant of the case does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering the aforesaid facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8. In view of aforesaid, the entire impugned proceedings, including charge- sheet & cognizance/ summoning order, of the aforesaid case, against applicant - Trivendra Kumar are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed in above terms. September 16, 2025 CS/- A482 No. 34282 of 2022 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad