Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47481 (PNJ)

ARHAM JAIN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/12944/2021 · 2025-08-27

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 CWP-12944-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 ARHAM JAIN ... Petitioner V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Lajpat Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Addl. A.G. Haryana. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the previous order passed by this Court, respondents have called upon the petitioner to deposit 2% of the claim amount so that a Standing Empowered Committee can be constituted in terms of Clause 23.5 of the Contract Agreement. Counsel submits that in view of this development, writ petition has become infructuous. He has instructions to state that the petitioner will deposit the requisite amount within a period of two weeks. 2. In case, the amount is deposited within the aforesaid period, respondents shall constitute the Standing Empowered Committee within a period of four weeks thereafter. 3. Writ petition is disposed of. ( SUVIR SEHGAL ) JUDGE 27.08.2025 pooja saini Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Pooja Saini 2025.09.01 11:32 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment