IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 679 Paramjeet Singh Sahota State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. No.2 and 3 to reconsider the case of the petitioner for being recommended for appointment to PCS (Executive Branch) against the vacanc years 2001 and 2003 or declaring Rule 9 of the Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) Class surviving due to the efflux of time. 2. revived by demonstrating that the 22.05.2025 parveen kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Paramjeet Singh Sahota Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition for directing respondents No.2 and 3 to reconsider the case of the petitioner for being recommended for appointment to PCS (Executive Branch) against the vacanc years 2001 and 2003 or declaring Rule 9 of the Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) Class-I Rule, 1976 to be surviving due to the efflux of time. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get revived by demonstrating that the lis still subsists. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2725-2004 (O & M) Date of decision: 22.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Prayer made in the present petition for directing respondents No.2 and 3 to reconsider the case of the petitioner for being recommended for appointment to PCS (Executive Branch) against the vacancies of the years 2001 and 2003 or declaring Rule 9 of the Punjab Civil Services I Rule, 1976 to be ultra vires, might not even be Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.22 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.