[2025:RJ-JP:43900] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5010/2010 Bhavna Sharma D/o Shri Pushpendra Sharma, W/o Shri Kumar Sharma, aged 30 years, R/o near Parwala Kuwa, Teh. Hindan, District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Technical Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Personnel, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Singhal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG & Mr. Jeetendra Kumar Thakar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 01/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayers: “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that the present writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by Respondent No.1 may kindly be quashed and set aside and respondents may kindly be further directed to allow the petitioner to join the post of Lecturer for Electroncis & Telecommunication Branch in pursuance of the order dated 05.06.2009 with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice.” [2025:RJ-JP:43900] (2 of 2) [CW-5010/2010] 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /189