CRWP-389 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 Vishal and another State of Punjab Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. 2. petitioners are major and unmarried. It is submitted that both the p living in live further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 6. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 1 (Annexure P liberty. 3. 4. the respondent 3896-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH and another Versus Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents nos.4 to 6, who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the petitioners are major and unmarried. It is submitted that both the p living in live-in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 1 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab the respondent-State. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3896-2025 Decided on:22.04.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the petitioners are major and unmarried. It is submitted that both the petitioners are in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 19.04.2025 3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the etitioners are in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 .04.2025 3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and , accepts notice on behalf of VINOD KUMAR 2025.04.23 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-389 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 Gurdaspur, to decide the representation (Annexure P grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order wou by this Court on the validity of their live April 22, 2025 vinod* 3896-2025 Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District , to decide the representation (Annexure P grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live-in relationship. April 22, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - ercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District , to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. ld not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever in relationship. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES ercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District and It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. ld not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever VINOD KUMAR 2025.04.23 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document