APHC010569552007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. S. GANPATHI RAMAN, R/O 10 STREET, MACHAVARAM VIJAYAWADA 1. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR VIJAYAWADA 2 OTHERS, VIJAYAWADA APPELLAGE AUTHORITY U/S. 53 OF THE A.P. SHOPS AND ESTABLISHMENTS ACT 2. LABOUR OFFICERII AND THE AUTHORITY U/S 50 OF THEA P SHOPS, AND ESTABLISHMENTS ACT VIJAYAWADA/ 3. M/S SPIC PHARMACEUTICALS DIVISION REP BY ITS CHIEF, HUAN RESOURCES OFFICER, SPIC HOUSE, CHENNAI Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Certiorari to set aside the orders of the 1st respondent in APSE A Case No. 5 of 2007 dt 22-6-2007 after calling for the records and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to pass final speaking orders in the IA 1 of 2007 in APSE. Case No.5 of 2007 filed before the 2n such other or orders as deem fit in the interest of justice. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16091/2007 S. GANPATHI RAMAN, R/O 10-VIMALA APARTMENTS, DBRK STREET, MACHAVARAM VIJAYAWADA-4 KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR VIJAYAWADA 2 OTHERS, VIJAYAWADA APPELLAGE AUTHORITY U/S. 53 OF THE A.P. SHOPS AND ESTABLISHMENTS ACT LABOUR OFFICERII AND THE AUTHORITY U/S 50 OF THEA P SHOPS, AND ESTABLISHMENTS ACT VIJAYAWADA/ M/S SPIC PHARMACEUTICALS DIVISION REP BY ITS CHIEF, HUAN RESOURCES OFFICER, SPIC HOUSE, CHENNAI-32 ...RESPONDENT(S): ition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of aside the orders of the 1st respondent in APSE A Case 2007 after calling for the records and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to pass final speaking orders in the IA 1 of 2007 in APSE. Case No.5 of 2007 filed before the 2nd respondent and pass such other or orders as deem fit in the interest of justice. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI VIMALA APARTMENTS, DBRK 4 KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR VIJAYAWADA 2 OTHERS, VIJAYAWADA APPELLAGE AUTHORITY U/S. 53 OF THE A.P. LABOUR OFFICERII AND THE AUTHORITY U/S 50 OF THEA P M/S SPIC PHARMACEUTICALS DIVISION REP BY ITS CHIEF, HUAN ...RESPONDENT(S): ition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of aside the orders of the 1st respondent in APSE A Case 2007 after calling for the records and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to pass final speaking orders in the IA 1 of d respondent and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 20443 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings before the 2nd respondent in APSE Case No.5 of 2007 and pass such order or orders as deem fit in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2007(WPMP 22960 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to post the WP.No.16091 of 2007 for being mentioned to facilitate the correction of the prayer in the WPMP which is subsequently to be carried out in the order copy and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 3 The Court made the following order: Sri V.N.S.L.Sasidhar, learned counsel, representing Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that despite his best efforts, the petitioner has not been in contact with him for a long time. He further submits that though he addressed a letter to the petitioner, he has not received any response till date. Since the matter pertains to the year 2007 and the petitioner has not been pursuing the case through his advocate, it shows that he has no interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. However, if the petitioner believes that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 26.09.2025 MP 4 229 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16091 of 2007 Dated: 26.09.2025 MP