[2025:RJ-JP:49298] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18040/2025 Lalu Ram Meena Son Of Shri Ganga Ram Meena, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Amer, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan State Co-Operative Bank Limited, D.c. -1, Lalkothi Shopping Center, Opposite Nehru Balodyan, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Through Its General Manager (Administration) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma Ms. Anindya Gupta Ms. Suman Kalal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akash Gaur, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been preferred with following prayer; It is therefore most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 09.10.2025 (annexure-1) and further be pleased to direct the respondent to retain the petitioner at Jaipur, or to post the petitioner at the place of his choice. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Om Prakash Chopra Vs. State of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15799/2025 (order dated 03.09.2025), Jhabar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.237/2025 (order dated 27.03.2025) and Pushpa Mehta Vs. State of Rajasthan in Civil Special Appeal No.1430/1999 and submits that the date [2025:RJ-JP:49298] (2 of 3) [CW-18040/2025] of birth of present petitioner is 108.04.1967 and in another 18 months, he will be superannuated on 31.03.2027 from the service but the respondents have transferred him from Jaipur to Kota. 3. Learned counsel for respondent while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Sultan Singh Sahu Vs. State of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18959/2025 (order dated 16.10.2025) passed by a Coordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur submits that petitioner has no right to claim transfer at particular place rather the petitioner is transferred on the basis of administrative exigencies. He also submits that if petitioner is on verge of retirement in another 18 months then he can submit a representation. He further undertake that the representation will be considered by the Department and will pass an appropriate order under intimation to the petitioner. 4. Having considered the submission and also considering the judgments as referred hereinabove, by both the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to submits representation to the respondent within 30 days though speed post or by E-mail. On receipt of representation, the respondent shall consider the representation on the basis of ground as referred in the representation and decide the same within 4 weeks of receipt of representation and communicate the decision to the petitioner by speed post or by E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. 5. The petitioner may re-approach the Court or any other Forum as provided under the law, if he is aggrieved of the decision of respondent. [2025:RJ-JP:49298] (3 of 3) [CW-18040/2025] 6. In the meanwhile, the transfer order dated 09.10.2025 qua petitioner shall remain stayed till disposal of representation by the respondent. 7. The writ petition is disposed with pending application, if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /321