Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47457 (AP)

Bhasker Reddy v. .State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22956/2021 · 2025-10-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010374852021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22956/2021 Between: 1. BHASKER REDDY, S/O NARASIMHA REDDY, AGE 57 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO. 87/920-B, TELECOM NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, TALUKA POLICE STATION, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TALUKA POLICE STATION, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. M/S LOTUS INFRA PROJECTS, REP. BY SNIT. B. BHANU REKHA, W/O P. MARIA DAS, RM. KURNOOL 6. SRI MURALIDHAR GOUD, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, OCC TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, R/O. VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. SRI P VENGAL REDDY, S/O. P. PAPI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEAIRS, R/O. H.NO.1-34/8/13, SAI BABA NAGAR, ATMAKUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2 8. SRI M VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, S/O. SHESHI REDDY4 AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.6-58, PIRUMANCHALA VILLAGE, JUPADUBANGLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus seeking a direction to the 2nd Respondent to receive petitioners complaint dated 19.09.2021 against the respondents 5, 6 7 and 8 herein and to forthwith initiate appropriate action against respondents 5, 6, 7 and 8 herein in the interest of justice and also consequently direct the respondents 3 to 8 herein not to interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession of petitioner's subject land to an extent of Ac. 1.72 in Sy.No 156/C1, Rudravaram Village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 8 herein not to interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession of petitioner's subject land to an extent of Ac. 1.72 in Sy.No 156/C1, Rudravaram Village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool Disirietand pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TRUPTHI AGARWAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. C SUBODH 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus seeking a direction to the 2nd Respondent to receive petitioner’s complaint dated 19.09.2021 against the respondents 5, 6, 7 and 8 herein and to forthwith initiate appropriate action against respondents 5, 6, 7 and 8 herein in the interest of justice and also consequently direct the respondents 3 to 8 herein not to interfere with petitioner’s peaceful possession of petitioner’s subject land to an extent of Ac.1.72 in Sy.No.156/C1 Rudravaram Village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and pass...” 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Heard Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and Sri K.Malikarjuna Murthy, learned Standing counsel for Andhra Pradesh Housing Corporation. 4. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.10.2025. SNI 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22956 of 2021 Dated.16.10.2025 SNI 109