Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010335562023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between:
1. KANALA SURYA NARAYANA REDDY, S/O.CHINNA PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC. SENIOR CITIZEN, R/O.DOOR NO.1 52, PANDIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. KANALA VIJAY BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O.DOOR NO.1 PANDIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTY. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GALIVEEDU POLICE STATION, GALIVEEDU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. VENKATA SIVA KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. SUB POLICE STATION, GALIVEEDU,
ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17185/2023 KANALA SURYA NARAYANA REDDY, S/O.CHINNA PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC. SENIOR CITIZEN, R/O.DOOR NO.1 52, PANDIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. KANALA VIJAY BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O.SURYA NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O.DOOR NO.1 PANDIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GALIVEEDU POLICE STATION, GALIVEEDU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA VENKATA SIVA KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. SUB-INSPECTOR, GALIVEEDU POLICE STATION, GALIVEEDU,
ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA KANALA SURYA NARAYANA REDDY, S/O.CHINNA PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC. SENIOR CITIZEN, R/O.DOOR NO.1- 52, PANDIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA REDDY,, S/O.SURYA NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O.DOOR NO.1-52, PANDIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GALIVEEDU POLICE STATION, GALIVEEDU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA VENKATA SIVA KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, INSPECTOR, GALIVEEDU POLICE STATION, GALIVEEDU,
ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT,
5. CHITLURI VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, S/O.IRAGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.D.NO.1-9, PANDIKUNTA VILLAGE, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in trying to compromise with the 5th respondent by abusing his official powers is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct departmental enquiry against the 4th respondent in the capacity of the 3rd respondent and take necessary action for violation of the procedure and law, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased forthwith direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to summon the petitioners to the 3rd respondent police station and not pressurize them to compromise with the 5th respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17185 of 2023
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in trying to compromise with the 5th respondent by abusing his official powers is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct departmental enquiry against the 4th respondent in the capacity of the 3rd respondent and take necessary action for violation of the procedure and law, and pass…”
2. Heard Sri CH Vidyasagar, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance.
5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.12.2025 KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO:17185 of 2023
Dated 10.12.2025 KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P. No. 17185 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
04.
10.12.2025
Dr.VJP,J
The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (vide separate order).
________ Dr.VJP, J KKV