KALPESH JANGID S/O SH. KAILASH CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/4468/2020 · 2025-11-21
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47447 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47447 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47153] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.4468/2020
1. Kalpesh Jangid S/o Sh. Kailash Chand, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 49, Jain Colony, Ganeshpura Road, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj.
2. Neetu Jangid W/o Sh. Kalpesh Jangid, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 49, Jain Colony, Ganeshpura Road, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj.
3. Kailash Chand Jangid S/o Sh. Chunni Lal, R/o 53, Jain Colony, Ganeshpura Road, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj.
4. Sharda Suthar W/o Sh. Kailash Chand, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 49, Jain Colony, Ganeshpura Road, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj.
5. Ashish Jangid S/o Sh. Kailash Chand, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 49, Jain Colony, Ganeshpura Road, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj.
6. Abhishek Jangid S/o Shri Kailash Chand, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 49, Jain Colony, Ganeshpura Road, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through P.P.
2. Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Superintendent of Police, Ajmer, Distt. Raj.
4. S.H.O., P.S. Beawar City, Distt. Ajmer, Raj.
5. Tilsi Ram S/o Sh. Sitaram, R/o Link Road, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj.
6. Kanhaiya Lal Solanki S/o Not Known, R/o Vinod Nagar, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj.
7. Nawal Kumar Jangid S/o Sh. Mangilal, R/o Krishna Colony, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj.
8. Mahendra Kumar Jangid S/o Sh. Ramchandra, R/o Hadiya Chowk, Sojat City, Distt. Pali, Raj.
9. Bhupendra Nath S/o Not Known, R/o Chhavni Road, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer, Raj. ----Respondents
[2025:RJ-JP:47153] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4468/2020] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Junaid Khan on behalf of Mr. Asgar Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 21/11/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of subsequent developments, the present petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of above statement, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/42