Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:52116-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5529 of 2025 Ashish Kumar Verma S/o Late Shri Awadh Kishore Verma Aged About 38 Years R/o Patelpara, Ambikapur, District - Sarguja Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Awar Secretary, Health And Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Law And Legislative Affaris Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh
5. The Commissioner Health Education, Swasthya Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 27/10/2025
1. Heard Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned G.A. for the State. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.10.28 12:02:47 +0530
2
2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:-
“a) quash/set-aside the impugned order dated 29.09.2025 (Arinexure P/1). b) Issue a writ, order or direction, moreover in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent to make necessary arrangement in Rule 3(d) of Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 2013. c) Direct the respondent authorities to re-consider the
order Annexure P/1 by respondent in accordance with law, within stipulated time. d) Pass any other order(s) that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take recourse to law before the appropriate forum.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent/ State has no objection.
5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti
3