[2025:RJ-JP:44156] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15728/2025 Priyanka Verma D/o Late Shri Gopaldas, R/o Village And Post Tehla, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner 3. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment / Order 03/11/2025 1. Instant Writ Petition is preferred with following prayer:- (a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby respondents may kindly be directed to give kindly be directed to give compassionate appointment to the petitioner as per his qualification and eligibility from the date of furnishing application with all natural consequences. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment dated 02.02.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1665/2024 titled as Pawan Meena Vs. The State of Raj. and Anr. submits that after death of father of petitioner, an application is filed by brother of present petitioner and also by present petitioner but till date the respondents have not decided the application about the compassionate appointment under the Compassionate Appointment Rules, 1996. He further submits that [2025:RJ-JP:44156] (2 of 2) [CW-15728/2025] petitioner is entitled for appointment on compassionate grounds in lieu of his father-Gopal Das. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /28