IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 114 KARAN AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking official respondents the hands of respondent dated 20.04.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the submitted that the petitioner 20.04.2025 before the raising their grievances as not yet been considered and no action has submitted that at this stage, the directions are issued to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: KARAN AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 and to take action on dated 20.04.2025 (Annexure P-6). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Senior Superintendent of Police, grievances as mentioned in the present not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Senior IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.3898 of 2025 Date of decision: 22.04.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at take action on their representation very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Batala (Annexure P-6) in the present petition but the same has been taken thereon. He further would be satisfied if appropriate Senior Superintendent of Police, of the the at their representation has recently filed a representation on ) tition but the same has further satisfied if appropriate of Police, Jyoti 2025.04.22 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.3898 of 2025 Batala to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner necessary action thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to h 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 22.04.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.3898 of 2025 decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 20.04.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.3898 of 2025 -2- decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab, who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-6) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No and take who is present in te and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without disposed the aforesaid within a ccordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.04.22 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document