[2025:RJ-JP:43678] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16273/2025 Shivraj Saini S/o Shri Ram Lal Mali, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Malooni, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan. Presently Posted As Nursing Officer, Primary Health Center Kalmanda, District Tonk Rajasthan Employee Id No. Rjt0200936005926 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director Medical And Health And Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Chief Medical Health Officer, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virendra Prajapat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 30/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy and issue raised herein is no more res integra as same has been considered and decided finally by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat at Jodhpur in case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal & Ors. : D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.532/2016 decided on 09.07.2025. 2. Having considered aforesaid, issue notice to the respondents. 3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:43678] (2 of 2) [CW-16273/2025] 4. He assures that if the controversy is finally decided and matter has attained finality in case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal & Ors. (supra), then the petitioner may submit a representation to the respondents in light of said ratio and the respondents will decide the representation within four weeks and if the judgment is applicable, the benefit shall be extended. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit representation to respondents within a period of 30 days now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representations, in light of ratio laid down in case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal & Ors. (supra). If the judgment is applicable, the benefit shall be extended to the petitioner accordingly. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/103