Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47438 (AP)

Naval Armament Depot Civil Employees Union v. The Union of India ,rep.by its Secretary

WP/6511/2014 · 2025-09-09

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010153052014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6511/2014 Between: 1. NAVAL ARMAMENT DEPOT CIVIL EMPLOYEES UNION, VISAKHAPATNAM-530009, REP.BY GENERAL SECRETARY, A.V.THOMAS,S/O.LATE A.J.VARGUHESE AGED 58 YEARS,R/O.QTR.NO._226/4 NAD COLONY, NAD VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK, DEFENCE HEADQUARTERS POST, NEW DELHI-110011 2. THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING IN CHIEF, EASTERN NAVAL COMMAND, NAVAL BASE,VISAKHAPATNAM-530015 3. THE CHIEWF STAFF OFFICER PA EASTERN NAVAL COMMAND, NAVAL BASE, VISAKHAPATNAM-530015 4. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER NAVAL ARMAMENT DEPOT, NAD POST, VISAKHAPATNAM-530009 5. SRI G TRINADHA RAO STORE KEEPER NAD VISAKHAPATNAM, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ order or direction one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings No.LR/6358/JCM IV/MM dated 2 JS,J W.P.No.6511/2014 24.2.2014 of the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary bad in law violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently by setting aside the same direct the respondents to call the petitioner union, rep. by its General Secretary, Sri. by its General Secretary, Sri. A.V. Thomas in all the Joint Consultative Meeting of Headquarters, Eastern Naval Command, Visakhapatnam and also to the meeting to be held on 11.3.2014 at Naval Base, Visakhapatnam in pursuance of the impugned letter dated 24.2.2014 of the 2nd respondent or any subsequent date and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 8077 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the respondents 2 to 4 from involving the 5th respondent in terms of the notice under proceedings No.LR/6358/JCM IV/MM dated 24.2.2014 of the 2nd respondent either on 11.3.2014 or any other subsequent dates IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 38691 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 193575 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SATYANARAYANA GUDIVADA 2. S SIVA KUMARI 3 JS,J W.P.No.6511/2014 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.09.2025 KAS