Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47427 (KAR)

SMT. TEREJA RUJAY SIDDI W/O RUJAY SIDDI v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER

MFA/100792/2023 · 2025-03-08

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE LOK ADALATH IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA AND SHRI MAQBOOLAHAMED M. PATIL, MEMBER M.F.A.No.100792/2023 [MV] (Lok Adalat No.50/2025) BETWEEN: SMT. TEREJA RUJAY SIDDI W/O. RUJAY SIDDI, AGE 47 YEARS, OCC. TAILORING, ANIMAL HUSBANDARY MILK VENDOR, AT PRESENT NIL, R/O. HANSHATTIKOPPA, TQ. YALLAPUR, DIST. KARWAR. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANJANEYA M, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD. 2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, P.B. ROAD, HAVERI, DIST. HAVERI. 3. THE CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, RANEBENNUR BUS STAND, RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI. 2 4. MR. SHAIKHMOINODDIN D. KHAIRATI, S/O. DADAHYATH, AGE MAJOR, OCC. TRANSPORT BUSINESS, R/O. MADNI, JASJID, TABIB LAND, FISH MARKET, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580024. 5. THE AREA MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, KALBURGI SQUIRE, DESAI CROSS, DESPANDE NAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580029. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S. C. BHUTI, ADV. FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. SURESH S. GUNDI, ADV. FOR R5) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 24-02-2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.28/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL RANEBENNUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THE APPEAL BEING REFERRED TO LOK ADALAT, COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION, THIS DAY, THE LOK ADALAT PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel for the appellant-claimant and the representative of Respondents-NWKRTC along with its counsel are present. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under: “In view of the Corporation appeal is allowed in part by reducing the interest, the above 3 claimant’s appeal is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn.” 3. In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER VNP /CT-AN