Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47425 (AP)

CHAVAKULA SRAVANI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/25443/2025 · 2025-09-21

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010498772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25443/2025 Between: 1. CHAVAKULA SRAVANI, W/O SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 1-69, REPURU MAIN ROAD, KAKINADA RURAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENUMANTRA POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ATTILI POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondents No. 1 to 5 2 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.25443 of 2025 herein to produce Mr. Pulla Krishna, S/o Latchayya, Aged around 24 years, R/o 4-173, Ramalayam Veedhi, Kakinada Rural, Kakinada District before this Hon'ble Court and direct Respondents No. 2 and 3 herein to initiate necessary action against the Respondents 4 and 5 for the illegal detention of the detenue and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K.P.S. SAILESH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 2. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 3 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.25443 of 2025 The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenue has been set at liberty. In the circumstances, nothing further survives in this Writ Petition and it is accordingly, closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 22.09.2025 MJA 4 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.25443 of 2025 566 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25443 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 22.09.2025 MJA