Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47424 (ALL)

SMT VEENA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/12544/2025 · 2025-05-25

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:89719-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (Sl. No.48) Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12544 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Veena Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar,Sheo Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ishan Deo Giri Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for a direction to respondent no.2 to pay compensation to her for plot no. 1109 kha area 0.08 hectare of village Gotha Pargana Satasi, Tehsil- Bisauli, District Budaun. 2. In paragraph-8 of the writ petition, it is stated that notification under Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was issued in the newspaper on 08.01.2021. 3. Copy of the extract of the alleged notification does not indicate that under which provision of law, the acquisition was made. It is also not clear to counsel for the petitioner. As the petitioner claims right to receive compensation on basis of a sale deed, it would not be possible for this Court to ascertain the claim unless the provision of law under which acquisition is being made, is clarified and the acquisition notifications are brought on record. 4. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file a better petition. Order Date :- 26.5.2025 Ashish Pd. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad