APHC010211942021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12206/2021 Between: 1. SRI RAM CHENGAIAH,, S/O CHINNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC- PETTY VENDOR, R/O MOPUR ROAD CENTER, DAKKILI, DAKKILI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE S I OF POLICE, DAKKILI POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. KAVETI PITCHANDI PITCHAIAH, S/O. MUNUSWAMI, AGE- 52 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O MOPUR ROAD CENTER, DAKKILI, DAKKILI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No. 3 in interfering into the Civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent and 2 pressurizing the petitioner to come for a settlement with respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary and without Jurisdiction IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to call the petitioner to come to Dakkili Police Station, SPSR Nellore District and not to interfere into the Civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.4 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S V MUNI REDDY 2. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12206 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No. 3 in interfering into the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent and pressurizing the petitioner to come for a settlement with respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary and without Jurisdiction.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.12206 of 2021 Dated.24.09.2025 UPS 214