Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47420 (AP)

The Raja Washermen Cooperative Society Limited v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/8647/2020 · 2025-09-16

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010143342020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8647/2020 Between: 1. THE RAJA WASHERMEN COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, NO. D.1543 MULASTANAM, ALAMURU REP BY ITS PRESEDENT AVIDI SHANTHARAO S/O.THATHARAO, AGED 45 YEARS MULASTHANAM AGRAHARM ALAMURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. ANGARA KRISHNA,, S/O. VEERAJU, AGED 47 YEARS, MULASTANAM AGRAHARAM, ALAMURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRNICPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE TAHASILDAR, ALAMURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE GRAMA PANCHAAYAT, MULASTANAM AGRAHARAM, ALAMURU MANDAL REP BY ITS PANCHYAT SECRETARY, EAST GODAVRL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.8647 of 2020 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.8647 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in trying to assign the land in R.S.No.231/1 for the purpose of allotting house sites under the scheme of Navaratnalu to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents, which was leased to the petitioners’ society long back and trying to dispossess the Members of the Society without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter affidavit of the 4th respondent submits that the subject land is classified as Mandabayalu, only an extent of Ac.1.00 cent was proposed for distribution of the house sites and the remaining land is not touched. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in R.S.No.231/1 of Mulastanam Jonnada Village, Alamuru Mandal, East Godavari District, strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted, for any public purpose and if the petitioners are otherwise found to be in possession of the same, they shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law, by giving due opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned including the petitioners. Any dispossession from the subject land shall not be made except by following the due process of law. 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.8647 of 2020 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 17.09.2025 PGT