Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4742 (UTT)

PARTH DHYANI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/422/2025 · 2025-10-07

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:8842 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 07TH OCTOBER, 2025 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.422 of 2025 Parth Dhyani .....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand and Another ..…Respondents Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. D.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Maneesh Bisht, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, No.1 Brief Holder. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Abhishek Sati, No.2/informant-victim Advocate through video conferencing. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The present Application has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.4699 of 2024, “State vs. Parth Dhyani”, pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/VIth Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun under Sections 323, 504 and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 1 2025:UHC:8842 2. Heard Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the respondent no.1 and Mr. Abhishek Sati, learned counsel for the respondent no.2/informant-victim. 3. Parth Dhyani, the applicant-accused and the husband of the respondent no.2, is present through video conferencing. He is identified by Mr. Maneesh Bisht, Advocate. Smt. Saloni Doval, the respondent no.2-informant/victim, is present through video conferencing. She is identified by Mr. Abhishek Sati, Advocate. 4. Both, the applicant and the respondent no.2 submitted that there were matrimonial disputes between them. They have settled their disputes. They have filed a Compounding Application (IA No.02 of 2025) and affidavits with their free will and without any pressure. 5. The respondent no.2 has requested to quash the entire proceedings of the said Criminal Case No.4699 of 2024. 6. The said request of the respondent no.2 has not been opposed by the respondent no.1. 2 2025:UHC:8842 7. Considering the totality of the matter, this Court is of the view that ends of justice would be met if the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.4699 of 2024, “State vs. Parth Dhyani”, pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/VIth Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun, are quashed. 8. Resultantly, the present Application, filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is allowed and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.4699 of 2024, “State vs. Parth Dhyani”, pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/VIth Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun, are hereby quashed. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt:07.10.2025 Neha 3 NEHA BISHT Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038e e7326b08b2d0e018b01be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F 32DE6BA960BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE487B2F E0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.10.07 18:16:59 +05'30'