Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47418 (RAJ)

JAY SINGH @ MACHCHHAR @ TARA S/O PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15274/2025 · 2025-11-24

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47495] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15274/2025 Jay Singh @ Machchhar @ Tara S/o Pratap Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Jheel, Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.0333/2025 registered at Police Station Baseri, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 3, 25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has fairly conceded and undertaken that the applicant is having ten criminal antecedents registered against him, and he wants to go reformation. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. It is submitted that if the bail is granted, the applicant shall be threat on the society. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, taking note of the undertaking given by learned counsel [2025:RJ-JP:47495] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15274/2025] for the applicant; and the fact that the applicant is a young man who has his entire career in front of him and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Jay Singh @ Machchhar @ Tara S/o Pratap Singh, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 7. Considering the criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant, this court deems it fit to direct the accused- applicant to reside for a period of six months at a distance of 250 Kms, from the place of his present residence and after completion of the aforesaid condition, applicant is directed to periodically mark attendance at the concerned Police Station once on every 5th of the month at 11.00 AM and he will also participate in the proceedings, if any. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /225