SMT SAFIA W/O BABASAB KARADI v. SRI RAJU MALLAPPA NAIK
RP/100139/2022 · 2025-03-17
V Srishananda
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47402 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47402 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2021:KHC-D:12887 RP No. 100139 of 2022 IN MFA NO.102009 OF 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
REVIEW PETITION NO. 100139 OF 2022 IN MFA NO.102009 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT.SAFIA W/O. BABASAB KARADI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. LAXMI NAGAR, VII CROSS, KAKATI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
2.
KUMARI SANA D/O. BABASAB KARADI, AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. LAXMI NAGAR, VII CROSS, KAKATI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
3.
GOUSPAK S/O. BABASAB KARADI, AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC.STUDENT, R/O. LAXMI NAGAR, VII CROSS, KAKATI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI.
4.
SMT.SARABI W/O. IMAMSAB KARADI, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. LAXMI NAGAR, VII CROSS, KAKATI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI ASHOK A.NAIK, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
SRI RAJU MALLAPPA NAIK
V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.18 15:27:13 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2021:KHC-D:12887 RP No. 100139 of 2022 IN MFA NO.102009 OF 2014
AGE: MAJOR, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO-07, HOLI GALLI, YAMANAPUR, BELAGAVI-590021.
2.
IFFCO TOKYO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, SHIKSHAK VISVAST MANDAL, SHIKSHAK BHAVAN, OPPOSITE SANMAN PETROL PUMP, COLLEGE ROAD, BELAGAVI-590020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI ANJANEYA M., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI S.K. KAYAKMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE (1) OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.10.2020 IN MFA NO. 102009/2014 ON THE FILE OF HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
None appears for the review petitioners.
This Court by order dated 12.10.2020, allowed the appeal of the claimants in part. If the review petitioners are not satisfied with the judgment of this Court, remedy lies elsewhere. It is noticed that the review petitioners did
- 3 -
NC: 2021:KHC-D:12887 RP No. 100139 of 2022 IN MFA NO.102009 OF 2014
file a Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Apex Court in SLP No.15323/2021, which came to be dismissed by
order dated 28.10.2021. Under such circumstances, reviewing the order dated 12.10.2020 would not arise at all. Accordingly, petition sans merit. Hence, the following:
ORDER
Review petition is dismissed.
SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
NAA CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 13