Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47402 (KAR)

SMT SAFIA W/O BABASAB KARADI v. SRI RAJU MALLAPPA NAIK

RP/100139/2022 · 2025-03-17

V Srishananda

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2021:KHC-D:12887 RP No. 100139 of 2022 IN MFA NO.102009 OF 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA REVIEW PETITION NO. 100139 OF 2022 IN MFA NO.102009 OF 2014 BETWEEN: 1. SMT.SAFIA W/O. BABASAB KARADI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. LAXMI NAGAR, VII CROSS, KAKATI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI. 2. KUMARI SANA D/O. BABASAB KARADI, AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. LAXMI NAGAR, VII CROSS, KAKATI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI. 3. GOUSPAK S/O. BABASAB KARADI, AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC.STUDENT, R/O. LAXMI NAGAR, VII CROSS, KAKATI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI. 4. SMT.SARABI W/O. IMAMSAB KARADI, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. LAXMI NAGAR, VII CROSS, KAKATI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI ASHOK A.NAIK, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI RAJU MALLAPPA NAIK V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.18 15:27:13 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2021:KHC-D:12887 RP No. 100139 of 2022 IN MFA NO.102009 OF 2014 AGE: MAJOR, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO-07, HOLI GALLI, YAMANAPUR, BELAGAVI-590021. 2. IFFCO TOKYO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, SHIKSHAK VISVAST MANDAL, SHIKSHAK BHAVAN, OPPOSITE SANMAN PETROL PUMP, COLLEGE ROAD, BELAGAVI-590020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ANJANEYA M., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI S.K. KAYAKMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE (1) OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.10.2020 IN MFA NO. 102009/2014 ON THE FILE OF HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) None appears for the review petitioners. This Court by order dated 12.10.2020, allowed the appeal of the claimants in part. If the review petitioners are not satisfied with the judgment of this Court, remedy lies elsewhere. It is noticed that the review petitioners did - 3 - NC: 2021:KHC-D:12887 RP No. 100139 of 2022 IN MFA NO.102009 OF 2014 file a Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Apex Court in SLP No.15323/2021, which came to be dismissed by order dated 28.10.2021. Under such circumstances, reviewing the order dated 12.10.2020 would not arise at all. Accordingly, petition sans merit. Hence, the following: ORDER Review petition is dismissed. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE NAA CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 13