Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:38770
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 752 of 2023 1 - Mani Ram Yadav S/o Shri Shivnarayan Yadav Aged About 53 Years Occupation Service, Working As Lecturer Posted In Officer Jashpur Distt - Jashpur (C.G.).
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Director Public Education Directorate Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur Distt - Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Commissioner Surguja Division Ambikapur, Distt - Surguja (C.G.). 4 - Collector Jashpur Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.). 5 - The Joint Director Public Education Surguja Division Ambikapur, Distt - Surguja (C.G.). 6 - Additional Director S.C.E.R.T/departmental Enquiry Officer Raipur Distt. - Raipur (C.G.). 7 - Presenting Officer/in-Charge District Education Officer Jashpur, Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubham Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT
2 For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. G.A.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 05/08/2025
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside of the impugned order dated 9.12.2022 ANNEXURE P/1 issued by the respondent no.2 in respect of order for holding of departmental enquiry against the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside of the charge sheet issued by the respondent no.2 against the petitioner on dated 16.9.2022 ANNEXURE P/9. 10.3 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous.
3
3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State agreed with the
submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Raghu Jat