MAHANTESH KALLAPPA KADADI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/103100/2024 · 2025-06-09
Venkatesh Naik T
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47397 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47397 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7444 CRL.P No. 103100 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
CRL.P.NO.103100 OF 2024 (482 OF Cr.PC/528 OF BNSS) BETWEEN:
1.
MAHANTESH KALLAPPA KADADI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O. AROGYA ADHAR HOSPITAL, TQ. KITTUR, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001.
2.
SMT. MAYURI MAHANTESH KADADI, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O. AROGYA ADHAR HOSPITAL, TQ. KITTUR, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001. …PETITIONERS (BY SHRI V. M. SHEELVANT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY PSI, GOKAK TOWN POLICE STATION, RPTD BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-580001.
2.
LAKKAPPA S/O. RAMOJI MALAGI, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: FARMER, R/O. BENCHANMARDI, TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001, KARNATAKA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
NOTICE TO R2 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 IN GOKAK TOWN POLICE STATION CRIME NO.72/2024 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S.189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 76, 54, 324(3), 352, 351(2), 190 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA 2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JNR.DVN) AND JMFC COURT, GOKAK, BELAGAVI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7444 CRL.P No. 103100 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the criminal petition with liberty to file fresh petition. The contents of the memo read as under:
“That, in view of filling of chargesheet in the above matter, the petitioners are not pressing the above petition and seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to file fresh petition challenging the charghesheet. Wherefore the Hon’ble court be pleased to dismiss the above petition as withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh petition, to meet ends of justice”. In view of the memo and supporting submission, the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted as sought for.
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE EM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37