, V APHC010620142016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) m ^.4 IPS (0 a FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 2025 OF 2016 Between: T.Pulla Reddy S/o. Late T.Chenna Reddy, aged about 58 years R/o.Brahmana Yaleru Village, Atmakur Mandal, Anantapur District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur District, Anantapur. 3. The Station House Officer, Atmakur Police Station Near Anantapur Anantapur District. 4. R. Chinna Subbi Reddy S/o. Late Nagappa, aged about 58 years, R/o. Brahmana Yaleru Village, Atmakur Mandal, Anantapur District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 interfering in Civil dispute and rights of the petitioner though O.S.No.814/201 5 is pending on the file of the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur illegally arbitrary in the violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and 1. -i-. consequently direct the respondent No. 3 not to interfere in civil dispute suit no. 814/2015. lA NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP 2572 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'^'^ respondent-police not call the petitioner to the Atmakur Police Station near Anantapur, Anantapur District pertaining to Government land shown as Rasta in suit filed by the 4'^ respondent pending disposal of W.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G ALLABAKASH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010620142016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Mi [3207] I FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 2025/2016 Between: 1.T PULLA REDDY S/0. LATE T.CHENNA REDDY. R/O.BRAHMANA YALERU VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL .ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ANANTAPUR, - 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER. ATMAKUR POLICE STATION NEAR ANANTAPUR ANANTAPUR DISTRICT,. 4.R CHINNA SUBBI REDDY S/0 LATE NAGAPPA, R/0. BRAHMANA YALERU VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL.ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2.THE Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 interfering in Civil dispute and rights of the petitioner though O.S.No. 814/2015 is pending of the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge Anantapur illegally of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and on the file arbitrary in the violation consequently direct the respondent No. 3 not to interfere in civil dispute suit no. 814/2015 A 2 LA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 2572 OF 2nifi Petition under Section 151 CPC . ^ praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent-police not call the petitioner to the Atmakur Police Station near Anantapur, Anantapur District pertaining to Government land shown as Rasta in suit filed by the 41 h respondent pending disposal of W P Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.G ALLABAKASH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME(AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND % WRIT PETITION NO.2025 OF 2016 O R DE R:- This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the action of the Respondent No.3 in interfering into the Civil dispute and rights of the petitioner though O.S.No.814 of 2015 is pending on the file of the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur as illegally and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to Respondent No.3 not to interfere in civil dispute pending in O.S.No.814of2025. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned 2. Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. There is no representation for Respondent No.4. During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government 3. Pleader has placed a copy of the written instructions, dated 05.02.2016 and would submit that petitioner and Respondent No.4 have civil disputes with regard to the land to an extent of 0.10 cents plot with house vide Registered sale deed, dated 18.12.2007. Hence, the 4*'^ respondent filed I.A.No.2879 of 2015 in O.S.No.814 of 2015 before the Principal Junior Civil Judge Court, Ananthapur on 28.12.2015. He further submits that the 4^'^ respondent lodged complaint in the Atmakur Police Station against the petitioner stating that inspite of Court orders the petitioner tried to close the disputed Rastha by plating Kadapa slabs which is illegal. Basing on the same, police called both the parties and advised them to approach concerned appropriate Court. 4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the appears that there is a civil dispute between the Petitioner No.4 with regard to the land to suit in O.S.No.814 of 2015 i Court, Ananthapur. As per Respondent No.3 advised them to maintain Law and Order appropriate Court to resolve their disputes. But they disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.4. case, it and Respondent an extent of 0.10 cents plot with house and IS pending before the Principal Junior Civil Judge they called both the parties and and to approach concerned never entered into the 5. Considering the above factual position as the civil suit is pending before the concerned Civil Court and the called the petitioner and the 4'*^ Law and Order and to approach the Civil Court submission of the learned Government interfering into the civil disputes between the 3'^ respondent accepted that they respondent and advised them not to disturb to settle their disputes and the Pleader that the police are not parties, in our considered view it IS appropriate and reasonable to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the 3^^ respondent not to interfere into the civil and Respondent No.4 pertaining to the suit schedule property. disputes between the petitioner 6. disputes between the petitioner 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the S'" respondent not to interfere into the civil disputes between the petitioner 5 and Respondent No.4 pertaining to the suit schedule property in O.S.No.814 of 2015 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge Court, Ananthapur. % There shall be no order as to costs. 7. 8. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. Sd/- M.S.V. NAVEEN CHANDRA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, 2. The Secretary, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police Anantapur District Anantapur. 4. The Station House OffiCjer, Atmakur Police Station, Near Anantapur Anantapur District. 5. OneCCto Sri G. Allabakash, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCS to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT 1 DATED:26/09/2025 ORDER WP No. 2025 OF 2016 0 9 OCT 2025 ^JSXurrent SectionxV^ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS