1 2025:CGHC:52142 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5495 of 2025 1 - Mohan Kaushik S/o Fhirta Kaushik Aged About 36 Years Occupation - President, Shala Prabandh Samiti Government Primary School Deori Khurd, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Additional Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Dierctor Public Instruction Directorate Chhattisgarh First Floor, C-Block Indiravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Secretary District Rationalization Committee (District Education Officer) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Takhatpur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Headmaster Government Middle School Deori Khurd, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Wadhwani, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 17/10/2025 1. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following reliefs: “10.1. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly allow the petition in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the respondents may kindly be directed to act in accordance with the rationalization instructions in accordance with law. 10.3 Any other relief which deemed fit and proper may also be issued looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the interest of the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a limited prayer that the respondent no. 4 may be directed to decide the representation filed by the petitioner on 01.09.2025 within a time frame. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State raised no objection in this regard. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 6. Looking to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and 3 keeping in mind the submission made by the respective counsels, and the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, respondent no. 4 is directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner in accordance with law, rules and regulations. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the present petition is disposed of. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion in respect of the merits of the case. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima