[2025:RJ-JP:47175] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IV Bail Application No. 13637/2025 Munesh Meena @ Muni S/o Chhote Lal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Santha, Police Station Mahuwa, District Dausa, At Present Tenant House No. A-20, Mithila Vihar Airort Ke Pass, Jagatpura, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma Mr. Trilok Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 21/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 843/2023 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur (East) for the offence(s) under Section 365 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner was not involved in the murder of the deceased, there is no evidence on record to show that the petitioner caused murder of the deceased with the other co- accused. The star witness PW.3-Shalini has turned hostile and not supported the prosecution story, that the petitioner along with the [2025:RJ-JP:47175] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13637/2025] other co-accused abducted the deceased in a vehicle. It is further contended that the deceased was married to Mrigendra Singh and there was no communication between the petitioner and Mrigendra Singh. It is argued that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the fourth bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Mr. Munendra Singh, SHO, Police Station Kanota, appeared on behalf of the Investigating Officer on 17.11.2025 in connected bail application. Upon inquiry regarding the petitioner's involvement in the murder of the deceased, he submitted that the petitioner was not present at the time when the deceased was murdered. However, it has been stated that the petitioner in connivance with the other co-accused has participated in kidnapping of the deceased. The call detail records clearly show that the petitioner was present at the location where the deceased was abducted. Further, the call details also indicate that he was in constant communication with the other co-accused Vikas. therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the arguments made by learned counsel for the appellant and after going through the statement of PW.3-Shalini and the statement submitted by the S.H.O., Police Station Kanota, [2025:RJ-JP:47175] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13637/2025] this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the fourth bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Munesh Meena @ Muni S/o Chhote Lal Meena, in connection with FIR No.843/2023 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur (East) shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /6