APHC010627502023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32362/2023 Between: 1. PIDATHALA SATYAM BABU, S/O VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. OUT SOURCING EMPLOYEE, NEAR CHURCH, ANASAGARAM, NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT-520012 ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF AFFAIRS, J674 PLUS VGV, NORTH BLOCK, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI, DELHI 110001 2. THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, KENDRIYA SADAN, 3RD, SULTAN BAZAR RD, BADI CHOWDI, KACHIGUDA, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA 500095. 3. THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , CBI / ACB, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass a writ, order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in forcing the petitioner to give statement as witness in CBI Case No.RC.18/(S)/2018- CBI/ACB/HYD, Dated. 27-12-2018 u/s 302 and 376 of IPC by issuing notice No.2823/RC.18(S)/2018-CBI/VSP, dated. 29-11-2023 and No.2938/RC.18(S)/2018-CBI/VSP, dated. 11-12-2023 violating the orders 2 JS,J W.P.No.32362/2023 dated 31-03-2017 of the Hon'ble High Court passed in CRAL.No.1518/2010 is illegal, unjust, against the criminal jurisdiction and against to principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 21 AND 22 of Constitution of India, attracts the provisions of Contempt Act, consequently to direct the 3rd respondent not to call upon the petitioner for the enquiry related to Ayesha Meera murder case as mentioned in the said notice by suspending the same and further directs the respondents not to force the petitioner to compel for giving statement and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass urgent orders to suspend the notices issued by the 3rd respondent vide No.2823/RC.18(S) /2018-CBI/VSP, dated. 29-11-2023 and No.2938/RC.18(S) /2018-CBI/VSP, dated. 11-12-2023 in CBI Case No.RC.18/(S)/2018-CBI/ACB/HYD, dated. 27-12-2018 u/s 302 & 376 of IPC till pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI 2. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) 3 JS,J W.P.No.32362/2023 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submits that the final report is filed before the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-Special Magistrate Court for CBI Cases (Non-PC Act), Vijayawada, and the petitioner were also served with the copy of the final report and the matter is coming up for objections. Perused the record. Since the cause in the writ petitions does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 01.12.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.32362/2023 224 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32362/2023 Date: 01.12.2025 KAS