APHC010517112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26712 OF 2025 Between: 1. MUDIREDDY BHARGAVA REDDY, S/o Samba Siva Reddy, aged about 43 years, R/o D.No.3/550-7/A, Ayyappa Road, Y.M.R.Colony, PoddaturTown AND Mandal, Kadapa District. 2. Lomada Sivapriya,, W/o Lomada Bala Gangadhar Reddy, years, R/o D.No.1/102, Ravulapalle Village, Khajipet Mandal, Kadapa District. 3. Mudireddy Gnaneshwar Reddy, , S/o Raja Reddy, aged about 53 years, R/o D.No. 4/3, Velavali Village AND Post, Rajupalem Mandal, Kadapa District. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat Buildigns, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Proddaturu, Kadapa District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, R District. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 26712 OF 2025 1. MUDIREDDY BHARGAVA REDDY, S/o Samba Siva Reddy, aged about 7/A, Ayyappa Road, Y.M.R.Colony, PoddaturTown AND Mandal, Kadapa District. 2. Lomada Sivapriya,, W/o Lomada Bala Gangadhar Reddy, aged about 40 years, R/o D.No.1/102, Ravulapalle Village, Khajipet Mandal, Kadapa District. 3. Mudireddy Gnaneshwar Reddy, , S/o Raja Reddy, aged about 53 years, R/o D.No. 4/3, Velavali Village AND Post, Rajupalem Mandal, Kadapa ...Petitioners AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat Buildigns, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Proddaturu, Kadapa District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Rural Police Station, Proddaturu, Kadapa IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. MUDIREDDY BHARGAVA REDDY, S/o Samba Siva Reddy, aged about 7/A, Ayyappa Road, Y.M.R.Colony, PoddaturTown aged about 40 years, R/o D.No.1/102, Ravulapalle Village, Khajipet Mandal, Kadapa District. 3. Mudireddy Gnaneshwar Reddy, , S/o Raja Reddy, aged about 53 years, R/o D.No. 4/3, Velavali Village AND Post, Rajupalem Mandal, Kadapa ...Petitioners 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat Buildigns, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Proddaturu, Kadapa District. ural Police Station, Proddaturu, Kadapa 2 4. The SubInspector of Police, Rajupalem Police Station, Rajupalem, Kadapa District. 5. M Shivakeshava Reddy, S/o Late Malla Reddy, aged about 52 years, Occ Employee, R/o D.No.118, Lekha Buildings, Yerramukkapalli, Kadapa City and Post, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. Meegada Jayamma, W/o Late Meegada Krishna Reddy, aged about 71 years, R/o D.No. 1/1848-33, Yerramukkapalli, Opp P.F.Office, Kadapa city, Kadapa District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 to 4 not to interfering with Civil dispute exists between petitioners and respondents 5 and 6 in respect of the suits in C.S Nos. 84, 85 and 86 of 2021 pending before the Honble Senior Civil Judge at Proddaturu Kadapa District, as illegal arbitrary unjust and unconstitutiona l and violated of Article 300 (A) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4TH respondent calling the petitioners to police station and pressurize to compromise Civil dispute, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4TH respondent calling the petitioners to police station and pressurize to compromise Civil dispute. Pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: M VENKATA RAMANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26712 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 to 4 not to interfering with Civil dispute exists between petitioners and respondents 5 and 6 in respect of the suits in O.S Nos. 84, 85 and 86 of 2021 pending before the Honble Senior Civil Judge at Proddaturu Kadapa District, as illegal arbitrary unjust and unconstitutiona l and violated of Article 300 (A) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4TH respondent calling the petitioners to police station and pressurize to compromise Civil dispute, and pass.....…” 2. Heard Sri M.Venkata Ramana Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent police have been interfering in purely civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. It is alleged that the petitioner is being frequently called to the police station and pressurized to settle the matter, though the dispute is civil in nature. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that the respondent police are not interfering in the subject matter of dispute and are not calling the petitioner to the police station. 4 05. In the present case, since the learned Assistant Government Pleader has categorically submitted that the police are not interfering in the civil dispute and no coercive action is being taken against the petitioner, this Court is of the view that no further orders are required in this matter. 06. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedies before the competent Civil Court in respect of the property dispute. The police shall strictly adhere to follow due process of law and shall not summon or detain the petitioners at the police station or interfere in civil disputes in the absence of registration of any cognizable offence. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 26.09.2025 KKV 5 264 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26712 of 2025 Dated: 26.09.2025 KKV