Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47375 (AP)

Mulakalapalli Venkat Rao v. The Station House Officer

WP/32132/2025 · 2025-11-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010615892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32132/2025 Between: 1. MULAKALAPALLI VENKAT RAO, S/O VENKAIAH AGED ABOUT 57YRS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O FLAT NO.301, NTR TOWERS CHANDARLAPADU ROAD, NANDIGAMA NTR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDIGAMA TOWN POLICE STATION NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR COMMISSIONERATE VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR 4. NARVANENI MURALI, S/O HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT 54YRS, R/O H.N0.6-6/B, RAITUPETA NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT 5. CHINTHALA SEETAIAH, S/O VEERA RAGHAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 65YRS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O FLAT NO.301, SRI VIDYA TOWERS (RAVURI-2) RAITUPETA, NANDIGAMA NTR DISTRICT 6. YVL NAIDU, INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANDIGAMA TOWN POLICE STATION NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2 respondent No.1 in interfering with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.4 in respect of Flat No.301, NTR Towers, Chandarlapadu road, Nandigama, NTR District which is the schedule property in O.S.No.269/2025 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nandigama, NTR District demanding the petitioner to vacate from the schedule property without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and also in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil dispute in respect of Flat No.301, NTR Towers, Chandarlapadu road, Nandigama, NTR District which is the schedule property in O.S.No.269/2025 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nandigama, NTR District without following due process of law in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of the unofficial respondent, the police have registered a case against the petitioner in Crime No.506 of 2025 of Nandigama Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 329(2), 115(2), 351(2), 318(4), 338 and 61(2) read with 3(5) of BNS. 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.11.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32132 of 2025 Dt.19.11.2025 Asr