IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 CRWP-3944-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.04.2025. Sumanpreet Kaur ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Tejbir Singh Hundal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. (Oral) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondent No.2 and 3 to provide protection of life and liberty to the petitioners, at the hands of respondents No.4 to 9. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is having threat at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 9. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already moved a representation dated 16.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) to respondent No.2 and he would be satisfied if the aforesaid representation is decided. Notice of motion. Mr. Inderjeet Singh Ladher, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice and submitted that he has not objection if the aforesaid representation dated 16.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) is decided. KOMAL 2025.04.24 17:55 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRWP-3944-2025 (O&M) -2- In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2—Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga, to look into the representation and to take appropriate action, if any required at the earliest. Disposed of. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 24.04.2025. Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.04.24 17:55 I attest to the accuracy of this document